ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude 2 (Anthropic): Recently an AI start-up, recently made a significant breakthrough with the launch of its advanced AI chatbot, Claude 2, in the US and the UK. It is positioned to rival OpenAI ChatGPT and Google Gemini AI (Bard), Claude 2 emerges as a formidable competitor in the market.

Introduction to ChatGPT, Gemini (Bard) and Claude

Just five months after the introduction of Claude’s initial version, its successor amazes users with its ability to provide more extensive responses, nuanced reasoning, and outstanding performance. Notably, Claude 2 excels in the GRE reading and writing exams, solidifying its reputation as a top-notch chatbot.

Google, on the other hand, has equipped its Gemini (Bard) chatbot with a range of unique features, setting it apart from ChatGPT and further enhancing its appeal.

For your information: Google Gemini AI was earlier known as Google Bard, till the Google on “February 8, 2024” has updated it’s name (renamed) to “Gemini”.

In today’s fast-paced work environment, where meeting tight deadlines and handling numerous tasks simultaneously is the norm, AI chatbots offer an attractive solution. Seamlessly integrating technology and easing the burden of mundane tasks, these chatbots prove invaluable in diverse industries.

ChatGPT, Gemini (Bard), and Claude 2 are three of the most popular and powerful AI chatbots available today. They are based on different architectures and have different features and capabilities.

Let’s first introduce ourselves to these 3 powerful AI language models. Than we will compare them (Claude vs Bard vs ChatGPT), according to their use cases, features and useful functionalities.

What is ChatGPT?

OpenAI introduced ChatGPT in November 2022, captivating users worldwide with its remarkable human-like responses. Despite the introduction of numerous chatbots in the past six months, ChatGPT still continues to stand as a powerful tool, embraced by millions of professionals worldwide. As the months passed, ChatGPT became the go-to source for diverse information for many, even challenging the dominance of Google’s search engine.

Built upon the foundation of GPT-3.5, ChatGPT leverages a vast array of data sources such as articles, books, and websites, empowering it to comprehend human languages proficiently. OpenAI subsequently launched GPT-4, a more potent large language model, in March of the following year.

Although GPT-4 has a token limit of 8,912 and requires ChatGPT Plus subscription for access, it also introduces a wide range of plugins for summarizing documents, interpreting data, developing code, browsing the Internet, and more.

Its quick accessibility to a broad spectrum of topics makes it an invaluable resource for education, research, and general knowledge acquisition. Moreover, having personalized conversations with ChatGPT facilitate the improvement of communication skills.

For those not planning to subscribe to ChatGPT Plus, the regular version powered by GPT-3.5 remains highly capable and is free of cost. It caters to various tasks such as writing, editing, exploring ideas, fact finding, drafting emails, generating presentation ideas, conducting grammar checks, producing essays, and breaking down complex concepts.

What is Google Bard?

Meet Bard – In March this year (2023), search giant Google introduced its AI chatbot, Google Bard. Since its launch, Google has dedicated efforts to enhance the chatbot and is continuously doing so. Initially it was based on the LaMDA family of Large Language Models (LLM), and subsequently shifted to the 540-billion-parameter transformer-based LLM, PaLM.

Exciting news awaits those anticipating updates on Bard, as Google recently introduced an array of impressive features to the AI chatbot. Users can now experience Bard’s responses in over 40 languages through the text-to-voice functionality. In addition, Google Lens is also integrated into it, which allow users to upload images with prompts, thus making Bard a multi-modal.

Expanding its reach, Bard now covers more territories across the EU and Brazil. An intriguing customization feature also allows users to adjust the tonality of responses in five different ways – simple, long, short, professional, or casual tones. Additionally, Bard enables users to share responses via links, enhancing its usability.

The latest update includes the addition of numerous languages to Bard’s repertoire, such as Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, Gujarati, Arabic, Chinese, German, Spanish, and more. Importantly, akin to Claude, Google Bard remains freely accessible to all users.

What is Claude 2?

Latest of the lot is – Anthropic AI powerhouse – Claude 2. Claude 2 has impressively raised the bar by accommodating up to 100,000 tokens (equivalent to approximately 75,000 words) in a single prompt (wow, isn’t it!).

This substantial increase from Claude’s previous 9,000 token limit provides a unique advantage – enabling more contextual and improved responses. Anthropic proudly asserts that Claude 2 indeed delivers responses in a more contextual and enhanced manner.

This new model showcases remarkable progress across diverse fields, including law, mathematics, and coding, all validated through standardized testing. According to Anthropic, Claude 2 scored an impressive 76.5% in the Bar exam’s multiple-choice section, a significant improvement from GPT-3.5’s 50.3%.

Moreover, it outperformed over 90% of graduate school applicants in GRE reading and writing exams. In coding proficiency, Claude 2 achieved a score of 71.2% on Python coding tests, surpassing ChatGPT’s 67%. Additionally, its advanced computational skills shone as it scored 88.0% on 8 grade-school math problems.

San Francisco-based AI start-up Anthropic is the creative force behind Claude 2, an AI chatbot akin to ChatGPT. The most prominent advantage of Claude is its ability to summarize nearly any document effectively.

Users can conveniently upload multiple documents, request Claude to analyze the shared findings, and identify commonalities between them.

Notably, Claude 2 stays current with its information, holding an early 2023 cutoff date, compared to ChatGPT’s September 2021 cutoff, which is a Claude 2 big advantage. Presently, Claude 2 has a drawback of accessible only in the UK and the US.

ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude 2: A Comparative Analysis

=> Hope till now, few things are cleared. But, we can understand that, you still might are finding yourself confused or unsure about which Generative AI chatbot can best assist you in your work endeavors.

To clear that, we have prepared a comprehensive comparison of the three leading AI Chatbots (Claude Bard Chatgpt) – which are aiding millions of users worldwide in making informed choices and helping them in their daily lives. We will compare and contrast these three chatbots on various aspects, such as:

• Knowledge base and accuracy
• Conversational skills and tone
• Content summarization and generation
• Coding and data analysis
• Accessibility and pricing

Knowledge base and accuracy

One of the most important factors to consider when choosing an AI chatbot is how well it can answer your questions and provide right, reliable information. All three chatbots have access to a large corpus of data from various sources, such as Wikipedia, news articles, books, social media, etc. However, they differ in how they process and update this data.

• ChatGPT is based on the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 architectures, which are trained on a massive dataset of over 175 billion parameters. However, the knowledge cutoff date of ChatGPT is September 2021, which means it does not have access or very limited knowledge to the latest information and events that occurred after that date.
• Gemini (Bard) is based on the BERT architecture, which is trained on a smaller dataset of 340 million parameters, but uses a dynamic knowledge graph to fetch real-time information from the web. This means it can answer questions that require up-to-date data, such as current affairs, sports, weather, etc.
• Claude 2 is based on the Anthropic architecture, which is trained on a proprietary dataset of unknown size and parameters (Claude 2 parameter). It has a knowledge cutoff date of early 2023, which means it is more updated than ChatGPT, but may still lag behind Bard in some cases.

Based on these differences, we can conclude that Bard has an edge over ChatGPT and Claude 2 in terms of knowledge base and accuracy, especially for questions that require real-time data. However, ChatGPT and Claude 2 may still perform well for questions that do not depend on recent information.

Conversational skills and tone

Another important factor to consider when choosing an AI chatbot is how well it can engage you in a natural and interactive conversation. All three chatbots have the ability to understand and respond to natural language queries, but they differ in how they express themselves and adapt to different tones.

• OpenAI ChatGPT is known for its conversational abilities and extensive training on a wide range of topics. It can generate fluent and coherent responses that are often witty, humorous, or sarcastic. It can also switch between different tones, such as formal, casual, friendly, etc., depending on the context and the user’s preference.
• Google Gemini is known for its accuracy and reliability, but not so much for its personality or style. It can generate factual and informative responses that are often concise and straightforward. It does not have much variation in tone, and tends to stick to a neutral or professional tone.
• Claude 2 is known for its in-depth analysis and summarization of documents, but not so much for its conversational skills or tone. It can generate detailed and comprehensive responses that are often informative and logical. It does not have much variation in tone either, and tends to stick to an informational or analytical tone.

Based on these differences, we can conclude that ChatGPT has an edge over Bard and Claude 2 in terms of conversational skills and tone, especially for users who prefer a more dynamic and engaging conversation.

However, Gemini and Claude 2 may still perform well for users who prefer a more factual and informative conversation.

Content Summarization and Generation

Another important factor to consider when choosing an AI chatbot is how well it can summarize or generate content from various sources, such as articles, videos, books, etc. All three chatbots have the ability to process and produce text-based content, but they differ in how they handle different formats, lengths, and styles.

• ChatGPT has a standout feature of being able to summarize long-form content into concise bullet points or summaries. For example, it can generate succinct summaries from articles or YouTube videos, making it an efficient tool for content creators and researchers. The GPT-4 model has a token limit of 8,192 tokens (about 6 pages), allowing for substantial chunks of text to be processed.
• Gemini has a standout feature of being able to generate content from scratch based on keywords or prompts. For example, it can generate poems, stories, essays, songs, etc., based on the user’s input. The BERT model has a token limit of 512 tokens (about half a page), limiting the amount of text that can be processed or produced.
• Claude 2 has a standout feature of being able to analyze and compare multiple documents at once. For example, it can find commonalities, differences, or shared findings between two or more documents, making it a powerful tool for researchers and analysts. The Anthropic model has a token limit of 100,000 tokens (about 75 pages), allowing for massive amounts of text to be processed.

Based on these differences, we can conclude that ChatGPT, Bard, and Claude 2 have their own strengths and weaknesses in terms of content summarization and generation, depending on the user’s needs and preferences.

ChatGPT may be the best choice for users who need to summarize long-form content, Bard may be the best choice for users who need to generate creative content, and Claude 2 may be the best choice for users who need to analyze multiple documents.

Coding and Data Analysis

Another important factor to consider when choosing an AI chatbot is how well it can handle coding and data analysis tasks. All three chatbots have the ability to execute code snippets or perform calculations, but they differ in how they support different languages, frameworks, and libraries.

• ChatGPT has a code interpreter, feature that allows users to execute code snippets for data analysis tasks. It supports Python as the main language, and can use popular libraries such as pandas, numpy, matplotlib, etc. It can also generate HTML and CSS codes based on user input.
• Gemini has a code generator feature, which helps and allows users to generate code snippets for various tasks. It generate optimized and efficient code in seconds. It supports multiple languages, such as Python, Java, C#, etc., and can use various frameworks and libraries, such as Django, Flask, React, etc. It can also generate SQL queries based on user input.
• Claude 2 has a code analyzer feature, that allows users to analyze code snippets for errors, bugs, or improvements. It supports Python as the main language, and can use some libraries such as requests, BeautifulSoup, etc. It can also generate pseudocode based on user input. Python as the main language, and can use some libraries such as requests, BeautifulSoup, etc. It can also generate pseudocode based on user input.

Based on these differences, we can conclude that ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude 2 have their own merits and demerits in terms of coding and data analysis tasks, depending on the user’s goals and preferences.

ChatGPT may be the best choice for users who need to execute Python code for data analysis tasks, Gemini may be the best choice for users who need to generate code for various tasks and languages, and Claude 2 may be the best choice for users who need to analyze code for errors or improvements.

Accessibility and Pricing

The final factor to consider when choosing an AI chatbot is “How easily it is accessible”, “How affordable is it” for different kind of users. If we compare these 3 powerful AI language models, all 3 are web-based platforms that can be easily accessed from any device with an internet connection.

However, there are some differences in how they require registration, authentication, and payment. Lets’s check out.

• ChatGPT is free to use for anyone, with a valid email address. Open the website “https://openai.com/” and users can sign up with their email and create a password to access the platform. There you can choose from which version of ChatGPT (GPT-3.5 or GPT-4) you want to start with, and what mode (balanced, creative, or precise) you choose.
  OpenAI’s ChatGPT is free for those, who only want to use the GPT-3.5 version, but it have some features may be limited or restricted. But if you want to use, the more powerful version, GPT-4. You will have to pay $20 per month for the ChatGPT Plus version.
• Google Gemini AI (Bard) is free to use for anyone, with a valid Google account. You simply have to sign in with your Google account, and start accessing the platform. You can can also choose between different modes (informative or creative) and different domains (general or specific).
• Claude 2 is also free to use for anyone, with a valid email address. Users can sign up with their email and follow a few prompts to access the platform. In Claude 2 also, you can choose between different modes (informational or analytical) and different domains (general or specific).

Based on these differences, we can conclude that ChatGPT, Gemini (Bard), and Claude 2 are all accessible and affordable for most users. However, some users may prefer one platform over another based on their personal preferences or needs.

Difference between ChatGPT, Gemini (Bard) and Claude

Claude vs ChatGPT vs Bard: To quickly summarize, the most important factors on which you can compare them and make your choice are listed below in the table –

Feature	ChatGPT	Gemini (Bard)	Claude 2
Availability	Global	Global	US and UK
Cost	Free (older version ‘3.5’); $20 per month (newer version ‘4’)	Free	Free
Token limit	4096, 8192 (for premium users)	4096	100,000
Conversational abilities	Excellent, can engage users in dynamic and interactive conversations on a wide range of topics	Good, can answer natural language queries and provide relevant information	Fair, can respond to simple questions and requests, but not very engaging
Knowledge base	Extensive, trained on a large amount of data from various sources	Real-time, able to fetch the latest information and events from the web	Comprehensive, able to find commonalities and shared findings between multiple documents
Web browsing	No	No	No
Summarizing long content	Effective, can generate concise bullet points or summaries from long-form content such as articles or videos	Moderate, can provide short summaries or snippets of web pages or documents	Superior, can digest up to 100,000 tokens (equivalent to 75,000 words) in a prompt and provide in-depth analysis and summaries of documents
Data analysis	Yes	Yes	Yes
Creativity	Yes	Yes	Yes
Coding ability	Impressive, can generate HTML and CSS codes from natural language descriptions or sketches	Limited, can execute some basic code snippets for data analysis tasks	Remarkable, can generate Python codes from natural language instructions or examples
Knowledge cutoff date	September 2021	None	Early 2023
Accuracy	High	High	High
Privacy	– Users can delete their conversations – Does not support VPN access	– Auto delete interactions (18 months) – Users can’t retrieve past interaction – Supports VPN access	– Users can delete their conversations – Supports VPN browsing
Limitations	– Only available in English – Lesser context handling capabilities than Claude 2 – More features in paid version	– API access is limited; context handling capabilities are less than Claude 2 – Sometimes provide generic information	– Only available in the US and UK – Does not allow users to retrieve past interactions – No internet access, may provide wrong information for real world data

Conclusion: ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude

In conclusion, ChatGPT, Bard, and Claude 2 are all powerful and popular AI chatbots that offer different features and capabilities. There is no definitive answer to which one is better than the others, as it depends on the user’s needs and preferences.

However, based on our comparative analysis above, we can summarize the main advantages and disadvantages of each AI chatbot as follows, Gemini vs ChatGPT vs Claude:

• ChatGPT: Best for conversational skills and tone; content summarization; Python code execution; free access with email; limited by knowledge cutoff date; restricted features for free users.
• Gemini (Bard): Best for knowledge base and accuracy; content generation; code generation; free access with Google account; limited by token limit; restricted features for free users.
• Claude 2: Claude 2 can analyze and compare multiple documents at once. The Anthropic model has a token limit of 100,000 tokens (about 75 pages), allowing for massive amounts of text to be processed. Provides more human like output.
  Best for GRE writing portion and for Bar exam. It can use libraries such as requests, BeautifulSoup, etc. It can generate pseudocode based on user input. In coding proficiency, Claude 2 achieved a score of 71.2% on Python coding tests, surpassing ChatGPT’s 67%.

Ultimately, the best chatbot for you will depend on your specific needs and preferences.

If you need a chatbot that is widely available and affordable, then ChatGPT is a good option.

If you need a chatbot that is free to use and has strong data analysis and coding capabilities, then Bard is a good option.

And, if you need a chatbot that is available in the US and UK and has strong privacy features, then Claude 2 is a good option.